Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
The correct answer is A. Class inclusion
Explanation:
Jean Piaget was an important Swiss psychologist mainly known for this theory of cognitive development that involved different stages and developments. In this theory "class inclusion" refers to the ability of children to consider an object or any other element can be included in multiple categories at the same time, for example, a dog can be classified into the category of animals, mammals, pets, domestic, etc. According to Piaget "Class inclusion" is mainly developed in the concrete operational stage (7 to 11 years) because before this, it is difficult for children to consider two aspects of an element at the same time and because of this, they are unable to recognize one element belongs to two categories.
This occurs in the case of four-year-old Meg because she does not consider marbles are classified within glass category and besides this, they can be either striped or white marbles. Instead, she considers glass category as different to marbles and because of this she believes neither strip or white marbles fit into the category of glass and therefore she answers there are more striped marbles.
Answer:
refused to move to the new village
Answer:
speak slowly and clearly in order that the other person can understand you
Answer:
a
Explanation:
the answer is a
"The Great Compromise was an agreement made between large states and small states regarding how much power states would have under the United States Constitution."
-google
