In 1990, members of the United States Senate are appointed by their state legislatures. Hope this helped!!
Answer:
There are differences between layers of the earth based on composition and in response to stress.
Explanation:
There are three layers of Earth based on 'chemical composition': the crust, the mantle, and the core. The outermost part is the crust which is less than 1% of Earth by mass. It consists of oceanic crust and continental crust. The mantle is hot and the last layer core is mostly composed of iron metal.
The physical behavior of earth depends on how much pressure it faces and its repose to stress. As we go deep inside the earth, the pressure and temperature increase. Lithosphere, Asthenosphere, Upper and lower mesosphere, outer and inner core are layers of Earth subjected to pressure. Lithosphere is the strongest layer. Asthenosphere being weaker than lithosphere.
The correct answer is B. Trust, competence and ethos.
The speaker will inspire credibility from the audience when it perceives his or her character and their ethos concerning the topic they are presenting. If they know it really well, they will speak with authority, which will engender trust. Their competence is manifested and it's easier for the audience believe and received what it's being conveyed.
Answer:
Small group
Explanation:
Small group discrimination is an intentional activity taken by the small groups to deliberately harm the minorities.
This segregation isn't upheld by existing standards or other controlling groups individuals in the prompt social or network setting.
Thus in relation to the question, a white student's small group on their without any one's support were able to pose the professor's office with racism depicting an instance of small group discrimination.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
