1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
10

If the Supreme Court states that a law is constitutional, can the same kind of

History
1 answer:
Sonja [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court’s decisions apply to all the States.

If Arizona passed a law that the Court found unconstitutional, that law would be invalid in all the other states. That’s the way they designed the Court.

Before a law gets to the Supreme Court, it goes through the state’s highest court, or the Federal Court for that district. If that court rules that it’s OK, the people against it can appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court rules against the law, that law goes away. Sometimes the Supreme Court can decide not to hear a case. when that happens, the law stands.

If the Court decides that a particular law is unconstitutional, Congress can always come up with a revised law.

You might be interested in
Bosnian Serbs began a program of ethnic cleansing to rid the country of Yugoslavians.
neonofarm [45]
Bosnian serbs began cleansing to rid of minorities also muslims and croats in bosnia not to rid of yugoslavia
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Germany’s reparation payments after World War I caused
sashaice [31]
Massive inflation.

-----
Please give me brainliest. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff of 1930?
Oxana [17]
The primary purpose of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff of 1930 was to raise tariffs on imports to the United States in an effort to protect domestic jobs. It was widely seen as a failure, however. 
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the answer to this
insens350 [35]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
I need 8 reasons why the us should not annex the Philippines
vaieri [72.5K]
1.Because no one wants to be under the control of America.
2. The US already has a lot of racial problems in its own country
3. The US is under a lot of national debt. 
4.The Philippines isn't doing anything to them so why do they care
5. The Philippines is way too far.
6. They were too worked up to get rid of Spain so they want to keep their independence
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Australia and new zealand were colonized by?
    8·1 answer
  • Two ways in which the proximity to water has affected Western Europe's settlement patterns
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the achievements of maharaja ranjit singh?
    11·1 answer
  • Getting a job after high school instead of going to college
    7·1 answer
  • A simile is an example of nonverbal communication. True False
    9·2 answers
  • How did the relationship between Japan and the United States become strained leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
    11·2 answers
  • General Santa Anna eventually became a dictator<br><br> True<br> Or<br> False
    5·2 answers
  • In some countries in Southwest Asia and North Africa, women are more likely to experience
    10·2 answers
  • What continent was almost completely colonized by European nations in the late nineteenth century?
    11·1 answer
  • 3.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!