Answer:
Because:
Explanation:
Those rose gardens are important. Portland has been nicknamed the City of Roses since 1888, and it celebrates its local history with a Rose Festival every year. The oldest public rose garden in Portland—near where I grew up on the city’s northern peninsula—has been around since 1909, and its most famous, the International Rose Test Garden, has been operating for almost a century. In addition to growing roses from all over the world, it’s a site for free public concerts and—as I recall from my preschool days—adjacent to a really, really good playground. Credit given to: theatlantic.com
<u>Local and tribal government</u> has direct responsibility for the safety of its residents and direct knowledge of the situation and accompanying resource requirements.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Local government is a form of administration of public in particular town, state and country. The local government is responsible for recreation and amenity services, development of economy and maintaining the register of electors.
Tribal government is an independent government that operates apart from the state or federal governments. Tribal government is the most important part of the American government. They are responsible for imposing taxes and creating court systems. Road and public work facilities were also maintained by the tribal government.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
A you compare things
B you say the difference
