John Hus- Czechoslovakia
Martin Luther- Germany
John Wycliffe- England
Ulrich Zwingli- Switzerland
John Knox- Scotland
John Calvin- France
Answer:
If the US lost the American revolution, I'd think you would end up seeing a similar relationship that the UK had with Canada, Australia, etc.
The immediate consequences would have resulted in the founding fathers executions or imprisonment. Some like Franklin, who were seen as more worldly may have kept their freedom but overall all those guys probably would be done as political actors. The British would have made the colonies pay for much of the cost of the war and the continued stationing of massive amounts of solders.
Over time the British would have probably continued to expand their control over the lands between the Appalachians and the Mississippi, resulting in a series of further colonies. Many of these colonies would be simple expansions of already existing colonies like New York, Pennsylvania and Virgina. I believe all three had claims to lands West of the Appalachians, claims that had to be dealt with and truncated in the new America, but may have been left alone in a 19th century British colonial America.
Explanation:
I am not completely sure but I think it's 'agrarian'.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
1) Women had many rights but were unable to practice law or medicine. 2) Female physicians could only be trained by women and could only treat women. 3) Any woman who could read or write would be able to be trained as a physician
Answer:
D. Competition leads to efficiency.
Explanation:
Mercantilism was a set of practices that aimed to strengthen the wealth of European states, by establishing a strong trade and expanding the economy resulting in the promotion of the enrichment of the bourgeoisie that could pay more taxes.
During this period of time, sea expeditions were heavily influenced to find new markets for local trade, the sense of economic competition between countries also began, which promoted a better quality of products to be stipulated. In this way, it was believed that competition was driving the efficiency of production processes.
