1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lesechka [4]
3 years ago
12

JIMMMMMM

Mathematics
2 answers:
Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago
7 0
>= means greater than or equal to
<= means less than or equal to

---------------------------------------------

Part A

The graph of y >= -3x+3 will have a solid boundary line and the shading will be above the boundary line.

The boundary line y = -3x+3 has a negative slope so it moves down as you read it from left to right. It goes through the points (0,3) and (1,0)

--------------

The graph of y < (3/2)x - 6 will have a dashed or dotted boundary line. The shading is below the boundary.

The graph y = (3/2)x-6 goes through the two points (0,-6) and (2,-3)

--------------

If you graph both y >= -3x+3 and y < (3/2)x - 6 together, you get what you see in the attached image. This solution shaded region is the result of the overlapping prior shaded regions. 

---------------------------------------------

Part B

Plug (x,y) = (-6,3) into each inequality to see if we get a true inequality or not

For the first inequality we have
y >= -3x+3
3 >= -3*(-6)+3
3 >= 18+3
3 >= 21
which is false. The value 3 is not larger or equal to 21. So right off the bat we know that (-6,3) is NOT a solution. It is NOT in the solution region.

Let's check the other inequality just for the sake of completeness
y < (3/2)x - 6
3 < (3/2)*(-6) - 6
3 < -9 - 6
3 < -15
this is also false. The value -15 is smaller than 3, since it is to the left of 3

We're given more evidence that (-6,3) is NOT in the solution area. It is outside of both shaded areas. 

Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The point (-6,3) is not included in the solution area for the system.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given inequities are

y\geq -3x+3                  .... (1)

y            .... (2)

Part A: The related equations are

y=-3x+3

y=\frac{3}{2}x-3

Put x=0 in the above equation to find the y-intercept and put y=0, to find the x-intercept.

y=-3(0)+3=3

The y-intercept of first equation is 3.

0=-3x+3\Rightarrow x=1

The y-intercept of first equation is 1.

y=\frac{3}{2}(0)-3=-3

The y-intercept of second equation is -3.

0=\frac{3}{2}x-3\Rightarrow 2

The y-intercept of first equation is 2.

The related line of inequality (1) is a solid line because the sign of inequality is ≥ and the related line of inequality (2) is a dotted line because the sign of inequality is <.

Shaded portion of first inequality is above the related line and the shaded portion of second inequality is below the related line.

The solution area is shown in the below graph.

Part B: The point (−6, 3) is not included in the solution area for the system.

Check the given inequalities by the point (-6,3).

3\geq -3(6)+3

3\geq -18+3

3\geq -15

This statement is false.

Therefore the point (-6,3) is not included in the solution area for the system.

You might be interested in
Is this equation a linear relation, and please solve the equation?<br> -3x + 2y = 1
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is a linear equation and the gradient equation is given as:

y=mx+c

Where m is the gradient and c is the y intercept

-3x+2y=1

2y=1+3x

Dividing all through by 2

y=1/2 + 3x/2

Therefore the gradient of this linear equation is 3/2 and the y intercept is 1/2

8 0
3 years ago
Omar deposited $4000 into an account with 4.4% interest, compounded quarterly. Assuming that no withdrawals are made, how much w
melamori03 [73]
The formula you want is: fv=p(1+int/c)^(nc)
future value
principal
int
compound
years
7 0
2 years ago
Barb is making a necklace. She string 1 white bead,then 3 blue beads,then 1 white bead, and so on. Write the numbers for the fir
KiRa [710]
There will be 3 white beads out of the first 8.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If I can walk 9673.6 meters in 5 hours. How far can I walk in 70 minutes. ( I need the work)
den301095 [7]

First, convert 5 hours into minutes:

5 hours 60 min

------------ * --------------- = 300 min

1 1 hr

Next, find the unit rate in m/min:

9673.6 m

--------------- = 32.24 m/min

300 min

Now find the distance you can walk in 70 minutes at this rate:

32.24 m

------------- * 70 min = 2247 meters (answer)

1 min

You could walk 2247 meters (to the nearest meter) in 70 minutes.

6 0
4 years ago
2x+5&lt;3x+4 solve inequality
kompoz [17]
1 is greater than x
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of x? Your answer may be exact or founded to the<br>nearest tenth​
    14·1 answer
  • What time what equals 384
    12·1 answer
  • A die is thrown 100 times and a ‘6’ occurs on 32 occasions. Based upon this information find the probability of getting a ‘6’ wh
    9·1 answer
  • Please show your work how you solved this step by step ! Please answer this !!
    14·1 answer
  • Use the mooodel to solve for x<br> A.no soulution<br> B.x = 3<br> C.x = -3<br> D.x = -32
    15·1 answer
  • One batch of fruit salad has equal amounts of which kinda of fruit? explain how you decided
    9·1 answer
  • Which is a factor of 6x^2 + x − 7?<br> A. x + 1<br> B. 2x + 1<br> C. 6x + 7<br> D. 3x + 7
    10·1 answer
  • Find the area of the shaded polygons: Area of shaded polygon is __square units
    13·1 answer
  • Use the diagram to find the measures of the lengths of the sides. The perimeter of the trapezoid on the right is 93
    10·1 answer
  • Simplify<br> −<br> 2<br> x<br> ×<br> 3<br> x<br> ×<br> −<br> x
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!