Answer:
<h3>James G. Blaine's expansionist interests was based on promoting American influence in the Latin American countries and the world.</h3>
Explanation:
When James G. Blaine was in office as the U.S Secretary of Sate, he contributed immensely in the promotion of American diplomacy. He served two terms as U.S Secretary of Sate during Garfield and Harrison presidential administration.
Throughout his tenure, he worked hard on promoting American expansionists interests by establishing peaceful relations with the Latin America. He emphasized on the Pan-American Conference which led to the creation of the Pan-American Union in 1890. The union promoted friendship and cooperation among the American continents.
Blaine believed in commercialization and encouraged American commercial expansion in the global platform. He increased the naval power to promote easy and fast import and export of goods and services. This was also done to strengthen the naval force for military purposes.
During his tenure, Blaine mediated in the War of the Pacific from 1879 to 1883 between Bolivia, Chile and Peru. He wanted to establish peace for promoting economic prosperity in the Pacific region. He also inter-mediated on various international conflicts to establish peace among nations.
Answer:
A peaceful transition of power is a central tenet of American democracy.
Explanation:
Answer:
Which answer best explains James Otis' views of the Revolutionary Period? ... Otis felt that representation without taxation was tyranny
Explanation:
She has a very strong superego. In his theory of psychic entities, Sigmund Freud divided the psychic consciousness into 3 antagonistic levels that generate conflicts between them, and the resolution of that conflict is what governs our behavior. These levels are: The Id which is governed by the pleasure principle, the ego that is governed by the reality principle, and the superego that is governed by the principle of morality.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
