1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
6

Which statement about the relationship between Enlightenment philosophers and the philosophy of Robert Filmer is TRUE?       A.

Filmer suggested that governments represent the will of the majority, whereas Enlightenment thinkers advocated for minority rights. B. Filmer argued for a strong monarchy, whereas Enlightenment philosophers claimed that government was not necessary because natural law would allow society to advance. C. Enlightenment philosophers advocated government systems that protected the natural rights of man, whereas Filmer argued that people would be lost without the paternal monarch. D. Enlightenment philosophers advocated monarchical governments in which a central king would ensure the rights of the people, whereas Filmer argued for representative democracy.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Bad White [126]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is D i hope this helped
AVprozaik [17]3 years ago
3 0
<span>C.) Enlightenment philosophers advocated government systems that protected the natural rights of men, whereas Filmer argued that people would be lost without the paternal monarch

hope this helps

plz mark brainiest

</span>
You might be interested in
How would your country change if everyone could vote without limitations such as age restrictions and citizenship status?
antiseptic1488 [7]
Probably, some of the votes would not be well-informed, as you can't rightly expect toddlers to know about current political issues and politics in general. Also, without citizenship status, some could vote for a president that would benefit their country and not see the bigger picture.

hope it helps, brainliest pls
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the effects that shamus khan's class background might have had on his research at st. Paul's, an exclusive private boar
tamaranim1 [39]

Shamus Khan is a renowned sociologist with research interests on inequality and elites. He comes from an economically privileged immigrant family and attended St. Paul's school in Concord, New hampshire, where he graduated in 1996. Since he had a comfortable background and studied at that same institution, he was already familiar with the setting he would encounter during his reasearch in St. Paul's, which is stated in his book "Privilege : The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul's School".  

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the World Bank (WB), what is the requirement to be in the "developing nation" category? (5 points) A country must b
Mariulka [41]
<span>The answer is that a country must have a low- or middle-income.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Research on communication patterns in stepfamilies reveals several different communication patterns. In which pattern do the chi
torisob [31]

Answer: A

Explanation: outsider triad is a type of communication whereby the child is primarily communicating with his residence parents with limited awareness of his stepparents. Relating this passage with outsider communication, it can be deduced that since the stepparents are irrelevant to him in terms of communication, the type of communication is outsider triad communication.

Other forms such as complete triad is formed when the child see a real family such as both type of parents are seen as one family which doesn't relates to the passage, adult coalition triad explains misunderstanding between the parents which is also related to the passage and lastly linked triad which explains a type of communication were the child communicates with the other parent through one parent.

The best triad that relates to the passage is Outsider triad

6 0
3 years ago
If you are in an intersection and see an emergency vehicle, stop immediately and give them the right-of-way.
12345 [234]

Answer:

False  

Explanation:

In highway or any intersection, stopping the vehicle might cause crash as vehicles coming behind the first vehicle might hit other vehicle sin front when stooped abruptly.

In case of an emergency vehicle, there will be a traffic sign showing the direction from where the vehicle is approaching. Thus stopping the vehicle at once is not advisable, it may cause accidents.

Also, the right of way should be applied with courtesy and common sense.

Hence the answer is FALSE.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an independent agency?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Roosevelt immediately establish the new deal ?
    12·1 answer
  • Which details support Alvarez's ideas about the situation in
    14·2 answers
  • Environmental activists who wish to ban all carbon emissions spur a countermovement by manufacturers whose factories must emit s
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a factor of sustainable?
    8·1 answer
  • What happens to a problem-solving team after the assigned problem has been tackled?
    8·1 answer
  • How can we combat racism and conflicts between different races and cultures?
    10·1 answer
  • Jonah is working on building the new sign at the town's entrance complete with flowers, lighting, and an event marquee. At the e
    12·1 answer
  • Current Events- Must be social studies related
    14·2 answers
  • Ventajas y desventajas de que las colonias asiáticas y africanas se hayan independizado de los países imperialistas
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!