Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
You have mistreated me for too long George! I believe it is best that we go our seperate ways. All you have done is lie and cheat... Don't you understand what you put me through? Well i guess it does not matter now, because were done. Sorry it had to end this way George.
Loyalty? Is this a multiple choice or not..
Answer: cultural relativism
Explanation:
the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another.