Answer:
I think it's private it's the most logical answer
Answer:
d. To find a project's IRR, we must solve for the discount rate that causes the PV of the inflows to equal the PV of the project's costs
Explanation:
The internal rate of return, will be the rate at which the net present value of a project is zero.
net present value = present value fo the cash inflow - investment
using the IRR on the cash inflow we have a present value equal to the investment made, which makes the net present value equal to zero.
Therefore, the IRR is the maximun rate the project can yield
Answer:
B. What must be given up to acquire it
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is the cost which is to be sacrificed to gain for some better option
Since in the given case the aunt is thinking to open a hardware store but it will cost her $500,000 for rent and the to purchase the stock
And, also she also have to quit her accountant job for $50,000
So in this option quitting the job is to be considered as an opportunity cost
Answer:
$5,225,417
Explanation:
first payment 800000
1 quarter 250000
2 quarters 254000
3 quarters 258064
4 quarters 262193
5 quarters 266388
6 quarters 270650
7 quarters 274981
8 quarters 279380
9 quarters 283851
10 quarters 288392
11 quarters 293006
12 quarters 297694
13 quarters 302458
14 quarters 307297
15 quarters 312214
16 quarters 317209
17 quarters 322284
18 quarters 327441
19 quarters 332680
20 quarters 338003
11% = (1 + i/4)⁴
i = 0.106
quarterly interest = 2.65%
Now we need to determine the present value of this annuity and our discount rate is 2.65%. I will use an excel spreadsheet to determine the present value of the 20 quarterly payments and then add the initial payment.
$4,425,417 + $800,000 = $5,225,417
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
