in the United States, a governor serves as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief in each of the fifty states and in the five permanently inhabited territories, functioning as both head of state and head of government therein. As such, governors are responsible for implementing state laws and overseeing the operation of the state executive branch.
I think it is not led to spirit it is led to split.
The issue which led to split in the democratic party in the late 1850s is slavery.
Democratic Party was founded by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in the year 1790s and it was a counter to Federalist Party and helped in promoting states’ rights. Democratic Party split and formed democratic which was with Andrew Jackson and the other part is Whig parties and this was caused by Monroe’s successor together with the dissolving of Federalist Party. Slavery issue also led to another split.
Democratic Party was well known in promoting social liberalism which resulted in health regulation in the wake of public outrage and better working conditions
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.
Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:
The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
Jean Lafitte and his men were familiar with the area so the U.S. willing to use the services of them.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Lafitte additionally kept in touch with Governor Claiborne, offering his administrations and those of his men to guard New Orleans. He knew about the area and had more than 800 men in his direction. The British, acknowledging how significant it is have Lafitte on their side, offered Lafitte a pay off to join the British.
In any case, Lafitte denied the offer and rather cautioned the United States of the offer made by the British and speedily offered his administrations to Andrew Jackson. Afterward, as a byproduct of a legitimate exoneration for the dealers, Lafitte and his confidants helped General Andrew Jackson protect New Orleans from the British in the last clash of the War of 1812.
Answer:
<em>T</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>where it appears to be.</em>
Explanation:
hope it helps !!
