A claim is an unverified statement or theory which is made about something which may or may not be true.
<h3>Verification of a claim</h3>
For a claim to be validated, i.e, proven to be true (in science), then there needs to be tests and experiments which needs to be carried out to show that the claim is valid.
With this in mind, if for example if there's a claim that jewelweed helps to treat symptoms caused by poison ivy, then there needs to be a controlled experiment to see if this is true or not.
If after a series of experiments and it can be established without any iota of doubt, then the claim is valid and the scientific process will move to the next stage.
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to give you a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about claim and evidence here:
brainly.com/question/10877313
I think it is A because they can just destroy it but D is finding something natural to kill it off but it is GM so it wouldn't help so A
Water is treated with good respect.
That they are <span>caused by microorganisms.</span>
<span>Basically both operate by bouncing tiny particles or waves off of objects in order to make them visible. Electrons are smaller than light photons so we can see smaller objects clearly with electron microscopes. There are disadvantages though. First, color is a function of light wave frequency so we can't see electron micrographs in color. Color can be added artificially though by computer to differentiate structures, (think photoshop). Also, we cannot see electrons so we make them visible by bouncing them off a cathode ray screen similar to a TV set or computer monitor</span>
