Answer: The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Explanation:
Based on the information given and assuming that both parties have moved for a directed verdict, then the court should not grant either of the motions.
The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Answer:
D) It is generally more expensive to obtain than primary data.
Explanation:
A) It may not exist.
Problem. Primary data may not yet be available due to its sensitivity of the primary data.
B) It may not be relevant
Problem. Published data may not be applicable to your region. For example published data for Asia might not be applicable to Africa.
C) It may not be impartial.
Problem. Primary data used to create the secondary data might not treated all rivals equally.
D) It is generally more expensive to obtain than primary data.
Not a problem. Secondary data is not expensive as compared to primary data.
E) It may not be current.
Problem. Primary data collected might be out of date thus can not be used recent decisions as many things would have changed.
Answer:
$150 for budgeted direct materials and $180 for budgeted direct materials.
Explanation:
You take direct materials of 1.80 x sales volume of 50 units= budgeted direct material $90
To find a sales volume of 60 units, you take $1.80 of direct material X sales volume of 60 units= budgeted direct material of 108.
Answer: Revenue is maximum at x=25 and y=0. That is when the firm makes only yellow cakes and no strawberry cakes.
Explanation:
x- Number of Yellow cakes
y- Number of Strawberry cakes
Time constrain is given by
Revenue is given by,
At the vertices, revenue is
At (0,0)
TR = $0
At (0,150)
At (225,0)
Therefore, Revenue is maximum at x=25 and y=0. That is when the firm makes only yellow cakes and no strawberry cakes.
Answer:
b. bait pricing
Explanation:
Bait pricing strategy is one that is aimed at attracting customers by presenting a price that is lower than the actual value of a product. Usually the product is limited in quantity and when buyers come in they are convinced to buy something else.
This is considered an illegal means of marketing.
I'm the given instance when the customer got to the dealership the salesperson can't find that particular car on the lot, saying maybe it was sold this morning before he got in. The salesperson offers a higher-priced car.
This is bait pricing strategy.
