Answer:
Taking more samples from different parts of an acre.
Explanation:
Validity and accuracy of the data is crucial for any serious research. In this particular case, the most accurate data would be obtained if earthworms would be counted on the whole acre. Of course, this would consume lot of time, people, money etc. That's why methods for estimation are used. Estimation best works with large number of samples. Since one acre equals over 4000 square meters, taking only five samples from such a big area is simply not enough for obtaining valid data.
One of the possible ways to improve estimation is to take more samples per acre while avoiding taking adjacent samples because it could be possible that number of earthworms in one part of an acre is increased (or decreased) for any reason, which would lead us to wrong conclusion.
Given what we know, we can confirm that the basic idea resulting from these studies is that a creature's metabolism is related to its lifespan.
<h3 /><h3>How is metabolism related to lifespan?</h3>
From the studies done and the comparison of the lifespan of certain species in relation to their metabolic rates, scientists have noticed that <u>metabolism</u> and <u>lifespan </u>are inversely proportional. The <u>slower </u>the metabolism of an organism, the <u>longer </u>that organism can live.
Therefore, we can confirm that the basic idea is that a creature's metabolism is inversely proportional to its lifespan, meaning that the faster the metabolism, the shorter the lifespan of the creature in question.
To learn more about metabolism visit:
brainly.com/question/4707439?referrer=searchResults
I believe the answer is Metamorphic
Is there anything you need help with for this problem? I need to clarify first before answering your question.
