1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following expressions is correct?A. economic profit = total revenue - implicit costsB. accounting profit = economic

profit + implicit costsC. accounting profit = total revenue - implicit costsD. economic profit = accounting profit + explicit costs
Business
1 answer:
Ilya [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. accounting profit = economic profit + implicit costs

Explanation:

Implicit cost are the cost that already incurred but is not necessary to report such as opportunity cost. Whereas explicit cost are those expenses which involve the financial transaction and it is being paid.

Accounting profit is calculated by deducting the explicit cost from the revenue as follow.

* Accounting Profit = Revenue - Explicit cost

Economic profit is calculated by deducting both explicit and implicit costs from revenue.

Economic Profit = Revenue - Explicit costs - Implicit cost

So, using Accounting profit formula we conclude that

Economic Profit = (Revenue - Explicit costs) - Implicit cost

Economic Profit = *Accounting profit - Implicit costs

Accounting Profit = Economic profit + implicit cost

You might be interested in
Imagine that the U.S. economy has an initial unemployment rate equal to the natural rate of unemployment. Identify each event as
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Explanation:

Let’s explore one by one as proposed:

An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.

The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.

American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).

Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.

U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.  

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sara spends $25 for an all-day ticket to an amusement park. After one ride, it begins to rain and she wishes she had never come.
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

False, it is given that Sara spends $25 for all-day ticket in the amusement park. However, this is a shuck cost that she can not recover. Moreover, she has taken one ride so marginal analysis shows that all his $25 is not wasted. She has utilized some portion of their money so we can not say that she has wasted all his money.

7 0
3 years ago
After the accountant of Stallone Retailers had prepared the financial statements for the year ended 31 December Year​ 6, the fol
n200080 [17]

The adjusted profit of Stallone Retailers for the year ended December 31, Year 6 is £115,400.

Data Analysis:

1. Motor Van £8,000 Motor running expense £8,000

Depreciation expense  £1,600 Accumulated depreciation £1,600 ( £8,000 x 20%)

2. Cost of goods sold £3,000 Inventory £3,000

3. Drawings  £4,000 Inventory  £4,000

4. Loan  £2,200 Cash  £2,200

<u>Adjustment of Profit</u>

Profit before the errors  £112,000

Adjustments:

Motor running expense   £8,000

Depreciation expense    (£1,600)

Cost of goods sold         (£3,000)

Adjusted profit            £115,400

Thus, the adjusted profit is now £115,400.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/3816206

4 0
2 years ago
Explain how the core product and supplementary services are integrated in the context of an overnight hotel stay. please give de
DaniilM [7]
The core product alludes to the overnight rental of a room. Its parts are benefited level, booking, nature of the procedure, and the client's part in the utilization of the room. Supplementary administrations incorporate things like stopping, room administration, reservations, and a breakfast buffet. Conveyance of both the center and the supplementary administrations is given electronically, by means of lodging worker, or by the client. Telephone utilize and pay TV are naturally charged to the room. Room administration and registration are given by an inn representative. Most breakfast buffets are self-benefit, requiring the client to make a move.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lola owns a one-half interest in the Lenax LLC. Her basis in this ownership interest is $22,000 at the end of the year, after ac
Natali [406]

Answer: $3,000

Explanation:

With a basis of $22,000, Lola received a cash distribution of $25,000.

She would therefore get a gain (loss) of,

= $25,000 - $22,000

= $3,000

Lola received a gain of $3,000.

It is worthy of note that her basis after this distribution is now zero.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • EFG Transportation Company uses the straight-line method to depreciate its delivery truck. Which of the following reflects how r
    9·1 answer
  • States in which region receive more of their revenue from the federal government than do most other states? the west the northea
    9·1 answer
  • If nothing changes except that producers sell more of a good or service when the price increases, we know this is an example of
    14·1 answer
  • What is not part of maturity?
    14·2 answers
  • in order to make college more affordable for students from families with fewer resources, a government has proposed allowing the
    5·1 answer
  • Cushenberry Corporation had the following transactions. 1. Sold land (cost $12,000) for $15,000. 2. Issued common stock at par f
    7·1 answer
  • Merck &amp; Co., Inc. is a global, research-driven pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets a
    14·1 answer
  • Crane Company has 900 shares of 4%, $100 par cumulative preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2018. No dividends have been
    10·1 answer
  • Joe Donney operates a roller skating center. He has just received the monthly bank statement at August 31 from Citizens National
    7·1 answer
  • The charter of a corporation provides for the issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock. Assume that 45,000 shares were origina
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!