James K Polk is one of the historical figures that is really hard to judge by modern standards.
He was a forceful man with strongly held beliefs. He was the last in the line of "Jacksonian Presidents" with all of the baggage that came along with that.
Ultimately, he was a strong war time President. His single term in office led to the short lived Presidency of Zachary Taylor, who was significantly less informed and forceful than Polk. After Polk, the issue of slavery really came to the forefront. Polk was either responsible for delaying the prominence of this issue or just got lucky. It is likely that history would look much differently if Polk had a second term and continued his aggressive posture towards America's future.
I'd say he was a good President, for his time, who strongly acted on the economy and in regards to Mexico but whose record looks abysmal by modern standards and values.
<span>Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself emperor of France in Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris</span>
Answer:
Early peace , possibly?
Explanation:
The native Americans And the Government wanted to keep peace , and become allies.
Hope this might help.
Thanks
Fort Mackinac
During the War of 1812, the Michigan Territory supplied 534 infantry men and 22 cavalry men for a total of 556 men. Fort Mackinac was in American hands at the beginning of the War of 1812. However, the British captured it June 17, 1812 and kept it throughout the war.
Migration, trade, conquest, and pursuit of religious freedom.
