Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
It was invented to make objects that are far appear closer.
Both Italy and Spain have high levels of immigration, most likely due to their location close to northern Africa.
Sharecropping<span> is a form of agriculture in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on their portion of land (Wikipedia).
So that means workers would be payed with a portion of the food they produce. This would help both groups of people. The workers would get food and the owners would have workers who were motivated.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)</span>
Answer:
state and US government subsidy bonds as well as by company issued mortgage bonds.
Explanation:
