Their are many factors which force one to think about similarities between Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan by encompassing many issues like:
- Both embraced freedom of religion,
- heavily invested in developing a strong armed forces,
- revolutionized tax cuts to boost job growth and put money back into American operating-class pockets and
- advocated limited entitlement programs in favor of back-to-work and job preparedness initiatives.
The two are not entirely cut out of the same cloth though. There are a few disparities which stand out when it comes to Trump vs. Reagan. For example, opponents of Trump have long claimed that the head of state is not treating all citizens equally, especially that he is marginalizing women and minorities.While this point is being discussed, this is not the egalitarian stance of Reagan: he was a strong believer in personal freedom, and that applied to all men, irrespective of sex, color, faith or other traits.
Answer:
a trade route that connected Rome in the west to China in the east
Answer:
Explanation:
International organizations are usually established in order to encourage the cooperation of nations. This ensures the maintenance of peace and commerce. There are many pros and cons of US participation in such organizations.
One of the most important pros is the fact that participation encourages friendly relations among nations. This can lead to better trade deals or military alliances. Participation also makes it more likely for a country to maintain a positive reputation both at home and abroad. Finally, it can also provide more legitimacy to the government.
One of the cons of US participation is the fact that membership often comes with rules, and these rules can reduce the power of the President to act in a particular way in the international arena. Moreover, monetary contributions are sometimes required, as well as changes in legislation.
Hope this helped!!!
D. It imposed taxes on merchants who used gold trade routes that passed through Ghana
Here this might help you....
<span>Even though they were influenced by Egypt, this country had its own culture. They still had strong rulers who were females. They also had their own way of making pyramids
</span>
and this to....
<span>The Kushites controlled the army once they had conquered Egypt and the Kushite king Piankhy became Pharaoh; the Kushites always provided the major portion of the army during a subsequent series of wars with Assyria for the control Syria.
The Kushites were a warrior society, so that's how their soldiers were organized and fought, whereas Egyptian soldiers were professional regulars, a standing army.
Egyptian military commanders were basically Kushite puppets, so there was some strain in the relationship between the Kushite part of the army and the essentially subject Egyptian contingent, as the Kushites always made sure they had the upper hand during the 90 years or so of Kushite rule.</span>
