Three of the factors in Russia which fostered the revolution of 1917 were the impoverishment of the peasants who struggled to survive on their small plots of land and to pay the debts they owed to buy their land after the serf system was changed; many peasants who couldn't make a go of it fled to the cities and took part in the local industrial revolution but were oppressed by inadequate wages and poor working conditions and lastly WWI resulted in the poor masses in Russia being used as canon fodder in an unjust imperialist war to divide up the world differently unlike WWII which was to end the Nazi tyrrany.
The event that led to defeat at Waterloo was:
B.a Russian army strikes the final blow at the battle of Waterloo
Explanation:
The Russian army's final strike at Waterloo against the immortal guards of Napoleon which were supposed to be the old guard that never fell and then they were routed from the war leaving Napoleon himself defenseless.
This route was the final blow at the end of Waterloo's battle dealt by the Russians against Napoleon's forces and it resulted in an utter defeat on his side which Napoleon has rarely seen in his life's entire campaigns.
Answer:
Base on the question, I would say that US wanted to group the Native American in communities so that the rest of the US could freely expands West ward, life was anti - Native American. I hope that you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have further clarification
Explanation:
Answer:
hi how are you
The Missouri River would have flowed north across Canada. There would be no Hudson’s Bay. The Ohio River would not exist. Instead the “New” River of West Virginia would have flowed north to the St. Lawrence. There would be no Great Lakes.
The British colonies would have remained hemmed in along the Atlantic. There would be no easy access to the Mississippi and the interior might well have remained solidly French. If you did somehow get to the Mississippi, there would be no Missouri River to take you to the Rocky Mountains. There would be no Detroit, Chicago or Milwaukee.
you meant something like that?
Answer:
<h3>If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
- The statement that best explains an enlightenment position on the divine right to rule is "If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society."
- If we look from an enlightenment position, authority and power should be derived from reason as it does not believe in divine right theory of power and legitimacy.
- It believes that rights and liberties of the people are infringed upon and other forms of rational democratic processes are undermined when only one person takes control over the whole power.
