1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brums [2.3K]
3 years ago
11

Suppose a report on CNN says that there is an impending recession coming in the United States. As a result, Bert's family, as we

ll as many other like minded families and individuals, reduce their spending and instead fill up their piggy banks for a potential rainy day.As a result of this behavior:a) Nothing in the economy changes as a result of people choosing to save up some money.b) The economy is actually harmed as there is a sharp decease in consumer spending.c) The economy is stimulated as individuals begin to save up money and therefore have more money to spend on goods.In macroeconomics, this result is known as:a) self-regulationb) a business cyclec) normal behaviord) piggy bank fatteninge) the paradox of thrift
Business
1 answer:
lisov135 [29]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

b) The economy is actually harmed as there is a sharp decease in consumer spending.

Explanation:

As a result of the news of a recession people will react by planning for a future that may be bleek financially.

Savings will increase, the greater the fear of recession the more people will save to cushion the impact of recession. There is the possibility of job slow down in economic activities and resultant job losses so extra cash that would have normally been spent will be saved for the rainy day

You might be interested in
Which one of the following is not true when the economy is in macroeconomic​ equilibrium? A. When the economy is at​ long-run eq
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.

Explanation:

  • Throughout the macroeconomic equilibrium, the aggregate supply curve becomes equivalent to something like the supply curve, the real GDP seems to be comparable to potential Output (GDP), however, if frictional as well as systemic unemployment seems to be the maximum total poverty throughout the longer term.
  • Consequently, whenever the economy seems to be in macroeconomic equilibrium, the argument which is not accurate would be that the businesses would have excess power.

So that Option C is the right answer.

6 0
3 years ago
During the Reagan administration, the Laffer curve was used to argue that: a. lower income tax rates could increase tax revenues
solniwko [45]

Answer:

A) lower income tax rates could increase tax revenues.

Explanation:

The laffer curve is a theoretical model which argues that there a tax rate that theoretically produces the most revenue for the government. Said tax rate is between 0% and 100%.

President Reagan used this model to argue that a lower tax rate would actually increase government revenue. The logic behind this claim was that lower tax rates increases both public and private saving, which in turn increases investment, resulting in more economic growth, and more taxable income.

The validity of these claims is dispute and is subject to debate among economists.

6 0
3 years ago
NEED THIS ASAP
GaryK [48]

Answer:

When the economy reaches full real output, there is no spare capacity left and therefore as real output increases, the price level will increase. There are no workers left in the economy as full employment is reached.

5 0
3 years ago
Firm A has fixed operating costs of $100,000, variable operating costs per unit of $8 and a selling price of $20 per unit. Inter
WINSTONCH [101]

Explanation:

30th 30th weep 30th rip rip 50mil 480usd

6 0
3 years ago
Kimona Company hired you as a consultant to help estimate its cost of common equity. You have obtained the following data: D0 =
nlexa [21]

Answer:

-2.23%

Explanation:

The formula to compute the cost of common equity under the DCF method is shown below:

= Current year dividend ÷ price + Growth rate

In first case,

The current dividend would be

= $0.85 + $0.85 × 5%

= $0.85 + $0.0425

= $0.8925

The other things would remain the same

So, the cost of common equity would be

= $0.8925 ÷ $20 + 5%

= 0.044625 + 0.05

= 9.46%

In second case,

The price would be $40

The other things would remain the same

So, the cost of common equity would be

= $0.8925 ÷ $40 + 5%

= 0.0223125 + 0.05

= 7.23%

The difference would be

= 7.23% - 9.46%

= -2.23%

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is 42k-69k a year a good salary for an electrician
    9·2 answers
  • Suppose you are planning to spend $1,768 annually for vacation during the next 30 years. You are offered to pay $30,000 now so t
    10·1 answer
  • Name and describe the type of economy a country will have when the central government makes all the economic decisions
    13·1 answer
  • Steeler Company has $71,000 in total assets and $44,000 in total liabilities. What is the amount of its stockholders' equity
    14·1 answer
  • Hailey purchased furniture for her living room and spent quite a bit of money. After she purchased it, she started regretting th
    12·1 answer
  • Clonex Labs, Inc., uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The following data are available for one depa
    10·1 answer
  • A currency trader observes the following quotes in the spot market: 1 U.S. dollar = 122 Japanese yen 1 British pound = 2.25 Swis
    13·1 answer
  • Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe is a car company that makes four models, a hybrid sport utility, a sports car, a four-door sedan, and a
    10·2 answers
  • In incremental analysis, a. only costs are analyzed. b. only revenues are analyzed. c. both costs and revenues may be analyzed.
    9·1 answer
  • Broker Janet just finished a direct e-mailing campaign. How should Janet follow-up on direct e-mail advertising?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!