Answer:
B. lacking parallelism
Explanation:
The original sentence contains a predicate nominative (<em>singer</em>) and an action verb (<em>plays</em>), which shows lack of parallelism.
The best way to fix the error would be to use a parallel structure, which is the repetition of a certain grammatical form within a sentence:
"Shelia E. <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> the drums."
Now the sentence uses two action verbs <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> in the present tense, and this is an example of parallelism.
The fragment that is the best example of direct characterization is "the young man looks up guilty".
<h3>What is direct characterization?</h3>
This refers to the description of a character's personality or quality by the narrator or writer. This is the opposite to indirect characterization.
<h3>What is one example?</h3>
A clear example of this concept is "the young man looks up guilty" because in this statement the narrator directly describes one of the characters involved.
Learn more about direct characterization in: brainly.com/question/19805607
#SPJ1
<span>1 archaic : happy, pleased
2 archaic : inclined, desirous
3 a : willing
he was very fain, for the young widow was “altogether fair and lovely … ” — Amy Kelly
b : being obliged or constrained : compelled
Great Britain was fain to devote its whole energy … to the business of slaying and being slain — G. M. Trevelyan</span>
Since nothing is underlined, I am going to make an educated guess that the underlines clause is "who had worked with the business person". If that is the case, the correct answer would be D - adjective clause. It is a relative clause, to be more precise, because it starts with a relative pronoun "who", but that is a part of adjectival clauses, so that is the correct answer.
Answer:
once you email them u should get a response back, they will try and help with getting u a new password but i hoped they answer back to you :).
Explanation:
