The answer to this question is <span>generalizable
</span><span>generalizable refers to a case study's capability to be implemented into larger sample of the population. </span>In this particular case study, it is really hard to put the result of 53 personality studies into use because it is almost impossible to find all the indicators of the personality unless we know that specific person' for a pretty long time.
This machine was called the cotton gin
<em>Hope this helps!! Have a good day c;</em>
C.) Letter from Birmingham Jail
Answer:
The theoretical perspective which views the family as a living thing, with each component influencing all of the others is: the family systems theory.
Explanation:
According to the family systems theory, it is better to view the family as a whole instead of as individual elements. The family is a living thing, a complex social system in which the members interact. It is important to notice that each component is capable of influencing the behavior of the others. Therefore, if one individual changes, it is probable that the entire system will change as well, which may lead the other individuals in the family to also change.
Answer:
Explanation:
Get in touch with your local Jehovah's Witness branch. They can give you an earful on this subject.
They have religious reasons for objecting to transfusions. When it comes to children, the courts have overruled them saying that the welfare of the child is more important than any medical objection or argument that the witnesses may have.
People with Leukemia at some point in course of their disease, may need a transfusion. Nothing else will do. The cells in blood fight foreign antibodies and transport oxygen to organs that need it. If a patient's own blood can't do it, then a transfusion becomes necessary.
The courts have a right to dictate terms when children are involved. The courts do not have the same right with adults. If an adult chooses to end the suffering, they have that right. There even comes a point (in Canada at least) where death is an option. But an individual patient must give knowledgeable consent to taking his own life.
So medicine has a say in some things and not in others. In the United States, the population has not given up on the rights of the 1st amendment. And medicine can override even those rights.