In respect to this question, there are no options given to choose from. So i am answering this question on the basis of my knowledge and i hope that it helps you. Some states have enacted a Balanced Budget Amendment to their state constitution, which require them to hold spending in line with revenues.
<u>Discretion</u> refers to the use of personal judgment by police officers, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice system officials regarding whether and how to proceed in a given situation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Discretion is the use of personal judgement in criminal cases against offenders. Discretion is viewed as either positively or negatively in case of law. Discretion is practiced at all levels of jurisdiction.
For instance, a judge may use discretion to consider specific evidence or exclude it from trial. Likewise, the police have the power to enforce laws and in some cases are lenient enough to let an offender go. This is where discretion is considered to have a negative impact.
The answer is ensuring that risks are reasonable in relationship to anticipated benefits
When the principle of beneficence is applied to a study involving human subjects it is important to safeguard subjects in the experiment. No matter how important the anticipated benefits may be, the risks have to be reasonable to protect the people involved.
Southern states had slaves and Northern States was more about the industrial items. And even though northern states had less slaves they both had slaves. Richer soil in southern states allowed cropping which had to be farmed by slaves, weaker not good soil caused northern to use machines in others stuff so slaves where not need as much.
