Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, Inductive Generalization assumes that the obtained in established instances may be extended over all. The initial method is probabilistic deduction, the oldest type of inductive reasoning, and it was expanded in various forms, primarily with the intention of expanding the scope.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Political efficacy has to do with the perception individuals have about their influence and importance in political decisions. Therefore, a comparison of polling data asking if citizens feel their vote matter would be a good way to compare different societies' political efficacy.
Iran and The U.S dont get along, they are enemies.
Iran and the United States have had no formal diplomatic relations since April 1980. Pakistan serves as Iran's protecting power in the United States, while Switzerland serves as the United States' protecting power in Iran. Contacts are carried out through the Iranian Interests Section of the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, D.C., and the US Interests Section of the Swiss Embassy in Tehran. In August 2018, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei banned direct talks with the United States.
Answer:
The answer would be C.
Explanation:
A. wouldn't do anything for Mexico, it would just make more Mexican citizens flea from Mexico.
B. wouldn't work at all because a wall has been proven not to stop anyone.
D. wouldn't work either. Mexico enforcing or not enforcing anti-drug laws has been proven not to change anything. In fact, to compare this so that it makes more sense, guns are completely illegal in Mexico, and Mexican Citizens and Cartels still have so many firearms that are usually illegal in the United States. So what would happen if they even tried to change anything about enforcing fewer or more anti-drug laws?
<u>Main point is that education opportunities in Mexico would make a huge change, especially if it was more politic related because then it would cause another type of revolution to occur, resulting in people wanting to fight for a good cause and a better future for Mexico.</u>
<u>Answer:
</u>
The system which rewarded political supporters with government positions and which was blamed for much of the corruption that existed in government during the late TOUS was known as the Spoils System.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- This system allowed non-meritorious people to hold positions of great responsibility and authority merely for being in acquaintance with the leaders of the government.
- This system culminated in giving rise to corruption in almost all the activities that were carried out by the administration. Most departments that came under the government were observed to be engaged in corruption during the late TOUS.
