Answer: <em>n </em>-<em> 4 = -15</em>
<em>n </em>= -11
Step-by-step explanation:
If -15 is the same as 4 less than <em>n, </em>that means that <em>n </em>- 4 = -15
Then you add 4 to each side of the equation to get <em>n </em>by itself. (-15 + 4 = -11)
That step leaves you with <em>n</em> = -11
Answer:
fourth and fifth
Step-by-step explanation:
If George gets a 20% raise, that means he will now earn
$445 + $445*20% = $445 + $445*0.2 = $445*1 + $445*0.2 = $445*(1 + 0.2) = $445 * 1.2
So we know the fourth is correct.
We also know that current pay is 100% of current pay and the new pay will be 120% of current pay, so x/455 must be equal to 120% / 100% which is equal to 120/100, so fifth is correct too.
A three-dimensional vector field is conservative if it is also irrotational, i.e. its curl is

. We have

so this vector field is not conservative.
- - -
Another way of determining the same result: We want to find a scalar function

such that its gradient is equal to the given vector field,

:

For this to happen, we need to satisfy

From the first equation, integrating with respect to

yields

Note that

*must* be a function of

only.
Now differentiate with respect to

and we have

but this contradicts the assumption that

is independent of

. So, the scalar potential function does not exist, and therefore the vector field is not conservative.
Suppose a square is 100%, 50%: the square is divided into two equal parts, and one of them is shaded, therefore it is 50%. 25%: the square is divided into 4 equal parts, and one of them is shaded, therefore it is 25%. 150%: there are two squares, each divided into 2 equal parts, and 3 of them is shadowed, therefore it is 150%
Answer:
x=-58
Step-by-step explanation: