It could be argued that nationalist rebellions in Egypt and India were similar because "<span>A.both failed initially but laid the groundwork for future independence," since they were fighting for similar causes. </span>
The empires that the leaders of the Second Wabe were to rule were much larger than those of the First Wave. The colonies and people were governed from a distance, and <span>leaders </span>achieved the expansion of their empires through wars of conquest. The <span>leaders</span><span> had more military power, over the old divine power, because they
were in command of well-organized armies and fleets of ships to
dominate. Instead of seeing themselves as divinities, the
rulers of the Second Wabe were politicians, who allowed assemblies and
the intervention of the people, like the Greeks. The
new rulers were through politics, the creation of laws, new concepts
such as citizenship in Rome and Greece, as well as the possibility of
not governing for life, but elect leaders, as with the Roman Consuls.</span>
if you add the answer choices i can help
Pretty much the same way everywhere. The machines did the work of several men and also removed men from harms way. They also created more jobs not just displaced jobs. Men had to maintain the machines and operate them. Machines could lower the cost of products to the masses and there by increased the standard of living -... ....<span>
</span>
