<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Answer:
B. Either-----------or
Explanation:
'Either - Or' is used in the English sentence which refers to a choice between any two options. They are used to determine one or the other of the alternatives.
Either - Or is used to affirm each of the two alternatives.
In the context, it is given that :
We can take one of the two item, that is ----
1. shirt
2. sweater
We affirm to choose only one item from the two.
So, the answer is " B. Either-----------or "
" You can take <u>either</u> the shirt <u>or</u> the sweater."
Lucius is Brutus' servant
The class of '09 held its graduation ceremony at 7 o'clock
Why are you going to Canada in June?