Answer:
Authors reinterpret familiar stories because
Option A. To use shared references that allow the audience to feel more
connected to the story.
Explanation:
Authors refer to familiar stories so that they connect with the audience better. Audience already knows a story and when an author reinterprets that story, audience can better understand his version. They can understand his point of view by use of the shared references of that story which they are aware of.
He doesn't do this to improve the story as per option B. Also, he doesn't use simple dialogue in different languages as Option C. Option D is also incorrect which says that author wants to show advancement of literary and artistic tradition.
A hungry wolf shouted at his pack.
A comfortable couch sat in the lounge, waiting to be accompanied.
A car ran down the highway.
A cell phone sang its ringtone.
A butterfly danced through the air.
A dinosaur settled down to rest.
Stars beamed the night sky, looking down on the earth.
Mountains sat omnipotently, watching over the surrounding villages.
Ocean waves ran along the shoreline.
A boiling pot sighed steam out once the lid was opened.
Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
