I don’t understand what this is asking but ok 20+57=77
The main way in which John Marshall's interpretation of the constitution was different from Thomas Jefferson's is that Marshall believed that the Constitution could be interpreted fairly widely, while Jefferson was an "originalist".
D. Great Britain.
Source: My World History Textbook
"Great Britain, which long opposed construction of the canal for fear that it might fall into enemy hands, benefited more than any other nation... Instead of making Egypt powerful and independent, the Suez Canal provided the excuse for a British invasion and occupation of that country."
The conditions were different because germany had to pay millions of dollars due to the treaty of Versailles.Japan was different because they signed an alliance with Great Britain after WW1
Answer: The Supreme Court rupee that the constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves
