Answer:Fund available for checkable deposit will be reduced.
Explanation:
The use of the fund from the bond for purchase of security after deducting reserves fund will reduce the amount for checkable deposit which is a demand deposit account.
Answer:
The correct option is B. Although the budget is strained, PQR Inc. refuses to cut the training budget because when employees keep their professional knowledge current, they are more likely to be innovative.
Explanation:
It was best for PQR Inc. to not cut the training budget because properly trained staff can be very economical for the company. When a budget is planned for the training of the employees and the workers are trained time to time with new techniques then it leads to better performance by the employees. It would also increase the self-esteem of the workers as they would recognize the importance of a task and will come up with new ideas to perform the tasks in a much better way.
<span>Taurus's employer must record $60.76 for unemployment compensation because his yearly pay has not yet exceeded the $7,000 cap. Taurus's oasdi tax would be $60.76 and the medicare tax total is $14.21. The total payroll tax expenses for Taurus's employer to pay is $135.73.</span>
Answer:
Front running
Explanation:
Front running, also known as tailgating, is the prohibited practice of entering into an equity (stock) trade, option, futures contract, derivative, or security-based swap to capitalize on advance, nonpublic knowledge of a large pending transaction that will influence the price of the underlying security.
The blank is to be filled with the word Multiplier.
The Multiplier effect refers to the effect on national income and product of an exogenous(caused by a variety of factors outside the control of a single organization) increase in demand.
In other words, it means that the multiplier effect is an economic term, referring to the proportional amount of increase, or decrease, in final income that results from an injection, or withdrawal of capital.
Let's take an example. Suppose assume a company makes a $100,000 decline in investment of capital to expand its manufacturing facilities in order to produce less and sell less. After a year of production with the new facilities operating at minimum capacity, the company’s income decreased by $200,000. This means that the multiplier effect was 2 ($200,000 / $100,000). Simply put, every $1 of disinvestment produced an extra decline in $2 of income.
Hence, The idea that the eventual decline in spending will be much larger than the initial (autonomous) decrease in aggregate demand is the Multiplier.
Learn more about Investment:
brainly.com/question/3729664
#SPJ4