Answer:constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between whites and blacks was not unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Answer:
Generally, white power structures responded to the Civil Rights Movement based on their geographic location. Thus, most southerners spoke out against this movement, while most northerners supported the cause. This situation was even transversal to the Democratic and Republican parties, since for example Lyndon Johnson, Democratic President who approved the Civil Rights Act in 1964, supported the movement while Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas for the same party, did not do so in absolute.
In general, the governors and mayors of the south of the country did everything possible to prevent the advancement and achievements of this movement, through imprisonment (such as in Birmingham, where Martin Luther King was imprisoned), police repression and various government restrictions.
In contrast, northern politicians and those in Washington generally had a more open and responsive stance, supporting the movement and believing in equal opportunities.
I think it was the 14th amendment. Let me double check.
Farmers were essentially slaves, however, worked less hard. The agriculturist's activity was to plant and develop crops which were transformed into sustenance. Divine beings were dealt with well since they were the most elevated rank.The divine beings had services held by ministers. The Egyptians imagined that on the off chance that they treated divine beings well they would get a ton of rain and would enable the ranchers to develop crops. A few Egyptians were sold into bondage as a result of obligations or sold themselves to escape neediness.
