1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mote1985 [20]
3 years ago
13

How did the food sources for native americans of the north and northwest differ from those native americans living in the west a

nd southwest?
History
1 answer:
Lina20 [59]3 years ago
3 0

The food sources of Native Americans of the North and Northwest differed from that of Natives that lived in the West and Southwest due to the impact of  climate which determined the types of food that were available. People in the North and Northwest did not farm. Irrigation allowed the people in the west to farm in dry areas.

You might be interested in
During the Great Depression, Americans called shantytowns “Hoovervilles,” newspapers “Hoover blankets,” and their empty pants po
Llana [10]

Answer:

They clearly believed he was to blame for the Depression, and they despised him for bringing them so much misery and suffering. They held him responsible and despised him.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
Question 3 of 10
ella [17]

The correct answer is B; All people are entitled to fair treatment under the law.

Further Explanation:

The Code of Justinian was actually a large collection of laws from the Romans. All of these laws and principles were enacted by the Roman Emperor Justinian. These laws were put into place during the time period of 527-567 A.D. The laws stated that all people must have fair treatment.

The book of the Justinian laws included;

  • Justice and Law
  • The Laws of Persons
  • DE INGENUIS
  • Freedmen
  • Those not independent
  • The Power of Parents
  • Marriage

Learn more about the Code of Justinian at brainly.com/question/2377834

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
When was pearl harbor attacked by the japanese?
Sliva [168]
It was December 7 1941.

Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck Studying :)
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is outlined in the first three articles of the us constitution? A: relations between the states. B: the amendment process.
olasank [31]
A federal government structure is outlines in the first three articles of the U.S Constitution  
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The leader of the Russian revolution was
    14·1 answer
  • Help! Which statements describe FDR's presidency? A. FDR was very effective as a crisis manager. B. FDR inspired the American pe
    14·1 answer
  • The elaborate web of computer networks that people and businesses use today to exchange information is an example of improved te
    13·2 answers
  • What are the major issues affecting communities today?
    15·2 answers
  • ................................................
    6·2 answers
  • When Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette married, an alliance formed between which two countries
    10·1 answer
  • One effect of the Interstate Commerce Act (1877) was to put regulations on which industry?
    14·2 answers
  • Think about this sentence from the reading: “Slaves became part of the coastal trade.”
    7·1 answer
  • How did the southern states keep African Americans from voting without violating the Fifteenth Amendment? Please someone for the
    11·2 answers
  • What is the basic premise of an opportunity cost?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!