New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Reconquista was a period in the history of the Iberian Peninsula of about 780 years between the Umayyad conquest of Hispania in 711, the expansion of the Christian kingdoms throughout Hispania, and the fall of ... Alliances between Muslims and Christians were not uncommon.
Explanation:
The forced conversions of Muslims in Spain were enacted through a series of edicts outlawing Islam in the lands of the Spanish Monarchy. This effort was overseen by three Spanish kingdoms during the early 16th ... After Christian kingdoms finished their reconquest of Al-Andalus on 2 January 1492, the Muslim population.
<span>The 3rd Estate was paying nearly all of the taxes, and they were very poor, not even making enough to feed themselves, while the nobles and clergy barely paid taxes, and had all of the political power
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
They did this special court in 1692 to get rid of all witches when they started to see an 11 yr old girl behave diffelenlty.
