not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
No, she will not be overly concerned about her age difference in relation to her classmates.
<h3>
Age difference</h3>
Based on the given scenario she will not be overly concerned about her age difference in relation to her classmates.
The reason why she might likely be concerned will be if the topic is relevant to the age of the audience understanding as well as their needs.
Therefore she will not be overly concerned.
Learn more about age difference here:brainly.com/question/24528394
#SPJ1
Answer: C
Wellspring should produce flavored water both this week and next.
Explanation: Given that
The total costs to filter natural spring water = $38500
With Weekly revenue for plain water = $92,700
Gain = 92700 - 38500 = $54200
While
The cost of flavorings bottling = $38500 + $4600 = $43100
With Weekly revenue for the flavored water = $100,800
Gain = 100800 - 43100 = $57700
If the cost of filtering the spring water will decrease by $1,000 in the week ahead, then
Normal water gain = $44100
but the cost of flavorings will increase by $1,200.
Flavour water gain = 57700 - 1200
Flavour water gain = $56500
Since flavour water gain is more than normal water, we will conclude that Wellspring should produce flavored water both this week and next.
the answer is: A. The global demand for goods and services have increased.
Creating a port make it possible for producers in Georgia to distribute their products to the consumers in other countries.
Because of this, the global demands for goods produced in Georgia keep increasing over the years and it create a lot of job opportunities and purchasing power for the people in Georgia.
Menelaus asks his brother, King Agamemnon, for assistance.
