Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by"
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 6.5 lbs/square inch at 10% of significance. So then there is not enough evidence to conclude that the valve does not perform to the specifications
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the sample mean
represent the population deviation
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value for the test
Hypothesis to verify
We want to verify if the true mean for this case is equal to 6.5 lbs/square inch or not , the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
And replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by"
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true mean is significantly different from 6.5 lbs/square inch at 10% of significance. So then there is not enough evidence to conclude that the valve does not perform to the specifications
Answer:
(1/4)³
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps you
-c=p-r
If you were getting the negative C by itself you will want to move the R over on the opposite side. You do that by subtracting are to both sides the hours on the left cancel out leaving you with a negative C on the left side which equals P minus R on the right side
Answer:
If the robot has more mass, then it will take a bigger force to lift up another object. If the robot is going to lift something up, it will use its arms, and its arms have mass, and the object has a mass as well. If the robot's arms have a mass of 10kg, and the object has a mass of 12kg, it will use a certain amount of force to lift up the object using it's arms. If the the robots arms were 5kg instead, it would take less force to lift of the same object using its arms.
Answer:
ok
Step-by-step explanation: