1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
4 years ago
15

In what important why are the Supreme Court justices different that other government officials?

Law
1 answer:
anastassius [24]4 years ago
4 0
(LAW)
In what important way are the Supreme Court justices different than other government officials?

They serve 10-year terms.

They are responsible for choosing the President’s cabinet.

They are able to edit the Constitution.

They are not elected by the people, but rather they are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
You might be interested in
What generalization can you make about these five presidential elections?
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

The only safe generalization one can make on the subject is that it is common for today's candidates to ach was a fairly close election between the top two candidate

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
List 3 Interesting Facts about the First Amendment
Fed [463]

Answer:

1. it gave us the right to speak freely about our government

2.the right to protest gave us the freedom to directly challenge a law or idea that the people didn't like

3. the right of religion was a critical, yet unseen part of the first amendment considering most people were of se sort of christian branch

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Difference between negotiation and mediation
aivan3 [116]

Explanation:

In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.

6 0
3 years ago
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

Explanation:

John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.

However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.

This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.

7 0
3 years ago
This person must be present at their trials. They may choose to represent
gavmur [86]

Answer:

Defendant

Explanation:

A Defendant is a judiciary term used to describe the individual, firm, or organization being sued or accused by the plaintiff in court under the existing law of the place, state or region, or nation where the incident occurs.

The defendant is known to have some specific rights and obligations during the legal proceedings in a court of law. These rights and responsibilities include the following:

1. Defendants may choose to represent themselves

2. Defendant may decide to selecting or retaining counsel.

3. Defendant may choose what information to provide or withhold from the defense team.

4. Defendants may decide what to plead, if they want to testify, and if they want to file an appeal.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your roommate is injured in a terrible automobile accident and her parents asked you to contribute blood needed for her survival
    11·1 answer
  • When you want to things but can only afford one of the two the most valued alternative or the one you didn't choose is the a det
    13·1 answer
  • Which amendment is most responsible for protecting citizens' liberties from intrusion by state governments?
    7·1 answer
  • "Senses" refer to ...
    15·1 answer
  • Nhà nước Cộng hoà xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam không mang bản chất tính giai cấp đúng hay sai
    6·1 answer
  • Shortly after your 18th birthday you assigned your first jury summons you've been asked to serve on the jury for a federal court
    8·1 answer
  • What is political participation​
    9·1 answer
  • Choose one of the following types of government: direct democracy, monarchy, communist, dictatorship, oligarchy, or theocracy. C
    14·1 answer
  • “He [the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of
    12·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of law?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!