1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
2 years ago
8

In both Egypt and Mesopotamia, who occupied the lowest social class?

History
2 answers:
iragen [17]2 years ago
5 0
Slaves occupied the lowest social class.
If you ever need help with ancient Egypt let me know, I have a whole essay on it.
Paladinen [302]2 years ago
5 0
Slaves were the lowest social class, with no basic human rights. Artisans is most likely gentry, farmers were middle class, dependents were somewhat lower class and slaves where the lowest 

(Don't mean to be a bother, but mark as brainliest please??)


You might be interested in
True or False: Because of Federalism, states have their own courts system. <br> True<br> False
nadezda [96]
False, Federalism did not cause that.
5 0
2 years ago
After you sent your message, the commander responded with the following message:
eimsori [14]
<span>During WWII, Navajo code talkers used their native Dine language to encrypt messages for the US Marines. The commander's response means that "reinforcement of hummingbird squadron is in flight." Squash is code for "squadron" and fox light is code for "flight."</span>
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1600s Portugal posed a threat to Spain’s control of the
Shkiper50 [21]
False

In the 1600s Portugal posed a threat to Spains control of the borderlands


6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!
Dominik [7]

Answer:

1. Popular Sovereignty

2. Separation of Powers

3. Limited Government

4. Checks and Balances

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Voting is an important responsibility that citizens should take seriously. In some countries, such as Australia and Brazil, voti
WITCHER [35]

Hope this helps! - Oseli

Both compulsory and voluntary voting systems have merit, and this has to be considered if it were to be implemented in the U.S. A large benefit would be more voter representation. Democracy is very important to the united states, but low voter turnout means that it can be difficult for every person's voice to be heard. Furthermore, some people, like prisoners, don't get the right to vote, and this also hinders representation, especially concerning laws surrounding the justice system. However, a con of a mandatory system is that it Violates the freedom of choice, which in America value greatly. Free choice is an important right, and the government mandating voting can be seen as a violation of this. Making more people vote in incredibly needed yo have a healthy democratic country, but at the same time, it is also debatable whether mandatory voting is the best way to do it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Muckracker is another word for machine boss. true or false
    11·2 answers
  • The Cherokees were supported in their unsuccessful battle against removal by
    11·2 answers
  • What was saint augustine known for?
    13·1 answer
  • A specific area where people share one or more cultural traits is known as a __________.
    8·2 answers
  • One third of all coal miners in great britan in 1840 were under the age of 18. what percentage of the total numbers of coal mine
    13·1 answer
  • Why did xerxes want to conquer greece?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the different approaches to foreign-policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Which political party tends to vote in<br><br> favor of deregulating business?
    8·1 answer
  • What is Uncle Iroh's favorite tea from Avatar the Last Airbender?<br> :)
    8·2 answers
  • In what ways did the Nazi state seek to establish control over its people​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!