Answer: B) Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.
A geometric proof is a series of logical reasonings that, starting from a hypothesis, lead to a thesis, using a sequence of statements, axioms, and theorems.
Looking at Kelly's proof, we can say that she is not right. Indeed, she uses the thesis, what she wants to prove, as a justification for her statements.
On the contrary, Daniel uses definitions and properties as a justification for his statements. Although, he does not use the correct justification for statements 1 and 2. Indeed, ∠1 + ∠2 = 180 because they are a linear pair, as well as ∠1 and ∠4.
A linear pair is a pair of adjacent angles formed when two lines intersect, while the supplementary angles definition states that two angles are supplementary when they add to 180 degrees without being necessary next to each other. Since Daniel does not know the effective measure of the angles, he cannot use the definition of supplementary angles.
Hence, neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.
The answer to your equation is 88
Answer:
x = 51.05 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Sin(0)=opposite side/Hypotenuse
Sin(45)=x/60
Answer:
An integer is a whole, and it completes itself
Step-by-step explanation:
Even Negatives can be Integers, and Zero is the only number that is neither positive nor negative. Rational can be represented by integers, so Answer A. is true
Answer:
a rectangle
Step-by-step explanation:
1. a quadrilateral has 4 sides. this has 4 sides. this is a quadrilateral
2. a parallelogram has (a) opposite sides and (b) opposite angles of equal length. here, all sides are equal so (a) can be checked off. opposite angles are also equal so (b) can be checked off
3. a rhombus has 4 sides of equal length. all 4 sides are of equal length so this is a rhombus
4. a rectangle has 4 right angles. the angles here are not perpendicular to each other. thus, right angles are not formed and this is not a rhombus
