1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sleet_krkn [62]
3 years ago
6

The power to veto congressional legislation, is an example of the president's role as:

History
1 answer:
n200080 [17]3 years ago
7 0
Presidents role as Chief legislator
You might be interested in
According to Paul, the damage he created in the early Christian church before his conversion includes:
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

2. sending believers to prison

3. burning down church buildings

Explanation:

Paul has been given official authority to lead the persecution. In addition to triggering persecution in Jerusalem, he also requested letters from the high priest to the synagogues in Damascus. His goal was to take anyone who was a follower of Christ to Jerusalem.

3 0
3 years ago
What were the reasons spain established colonies? how do historians summarize these reasons ?
zvonat [6]

Answer:

Motives. Spain encouraged settlements in the New World to strengthen her claims to territory; to secure gold, silver, and valuable agricultural produce, such as sugar and indigo (a blue dye).

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
When was gunpowder invented?
gregori [183]
Gunpowder was invented somewhere around 900 in China.
Well, that's basically it... :P
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who assisted James Monroe in the writing of the Monroe doctrine?
netineya [11]

Two things had been uppermost in the minds of Adams and Monroe. In 1821 the Russian czar had proclaimed that all the area north of the fifty-first parallel and extending one hundred miles into the Pacific would be off-limits to non-Russians. Adams had refused to accept this claim, and he told the Russian minister that the United States would defend the principle that the ‘American continents are no longer subjects of any new European colonial establishments.’

More worrisome, however, was the situation in Central and South America. Revolutions against Spanish rule had been under way for some time, but it seemed possible that Spain and France might seek to reassert European rule in those regions. The British, meanwhile, were interested in ensuring the demise of Spanish colonialism, with all the trade restrictions that Spanish rule involved. British foreign secretary George Canning formally proposed, therefore, that London and Washington unite on a joint warning against intervention in Latin America. When the Monroe cabinet debated the idea, Adams opposed it, arguing that British interests dictated such a policy in any event, and that Canning’s proposal also called upon the two powers to renounce any intention of annexing such areas as Cuba and Texas. Why should the United States, he asked, appear as a cockboat trailing in the wake of a British man-of-war?

In the decades following Monroe’s announcement, American policymakers did not invoke the doctrine against European powers despite their occasional military ‘interventions’ in Latin America. Monroe’s principal concern had been to make sure that European mercantilism not be reimposed on an area of increasing importance economically and ideologically to the United States. When, however, President John Tyler used the doctrine in 1842 to justify seizing Texas, a Venezuelan newspaper responded with what would become an increasingly bitter theme throughout Latin America: ‘Beware, brothers, the wolf approaches the lambs.’

Secretary of State William H. Seward attempted a bizarre use of the doctrine in 1861 in hopes of avoiding the Civil War. The United States, said Seward, in order to divert attention from the impending crisis, should challenge supposed European interventions in the Western Hemisphere by launching a drive to liberate Cuba and end the last vestiges of colonialism in the Americas. President Lincoln turned down the idea.

In the 1890s, the United States, once again by unilateral action, extended the doctrine to include the right to decide how a dispute between Venezuela and Great Britain over the boundaries of British Guiana should be settled. Secretary of State Richard Olney told the British, ‘Today the United States is practically sovereign on this continent and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition…. its infinite resources combined with its isolated position render it master of the situation and practically invulnerable as against any or all other powers.’ The British, troubled by the rise of Germany and Japan, could only acquiesce in American pretensions. But Latin American nations protested the way in which Washington had chosen to ‘defend’ Venezuelan interests.

4 0
2 years ago
What are the major consequences of the "invisible trade" and how do they impact texans?
Fudgin [204]
A major consequence of invisible trade is that eventually the amount of invisibilities will exceed the payments for them. This means that the goods and services provided will be given, but payment for them is often neglected. This leads to a devastating deficit in funds. So the person or business supplying the goods can be in ruin, along with the person or business owing the money. This could threaten the economic strength of Texas.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Urgenntt!!!! Neeed ASAP! Please help me!!!!. Help!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Which country settlers try to work as trading partners with American Indians ​
    10·1 answer
  • What message did the Roosevelt Corollary send to the rest of the world?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the authors point of view
    11·2 answers
  • In his early years, what did Martin Luther obsess over regarding his relationship
    15·1 answer
  • What was an economic cause of the French Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • In muslim how many prophet did muslim have A. 25<br> B. 20<br> C. 15​
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER THIS!!! I AM GIVING BRAINLYEST TO THE FIRST ANSWER!
    10·1 answer
  • The lasting impact of the Northwest ordinance of 1787 was...
    6·2 answers
  • Imagine Patience and Hannah were living today in America. How different would their lives be? Would life be better or worse for
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!