Answer:
- Compare sources to analyze their content for historical bias.
- Approach current interpretations of past events as historical fiction.
Explanation:
Though you can distinguished hindsight bias everywhere in human history, the event was first defined and analyzed as such. We might further look at all the positions and secondary aspects and understand that given these variables, it was apparent what was going to follow. Early studies asked individuals annual-classification trivia puzzles or required them to anticipate federal elections; they asked members to evoke their foresight. You might step away from the movie believing that you knew it all along, but the truth is that you plausibly didn't. When a drama approaches its end, and we learn who the killer was, we may look behind on our concept of the movie and misremember our primary impressions of the guilty character.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
promoted a stance of isolationism
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
What ensued was a radical shift in U.S. foreign policy, which promoted a stance of isolationism that would last until World War II. Warren Harding won the 1920 presidential election on the promise of staying out of global affairs, and by arguing that the United states needed normalcy and a focus on internal problems.
<h2>#CarryOnLearing </h2>
◉‿◉◉‿◉◉‿◉
The major way that the geographic location of the united states affected its foreign policy before world war 2 was that it was protected by ocean, meaning it never felt the need to defend itself to a great extent.
D settlers took over the lands of the natives to be able to hunt the beaver and other animals used for furs.
There’s tons but a few examples would be the us, france, russia, cuba, mexico
