All categories

3 years ago

Anyone know the answer?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Soloha48 [4]3 years ago

8 0

<h2><em>208 Meters Squared. I believe.</em></h2><h2><em>I separated the thing into 3 shapes, a 4x8 rectangle horizontally, a 4x8 rectangle vertically, and a 12x12 square. I got 32, 32, and 144. I added them up to get 208m^2.</em></h2>

You might be interested in

Is (-5,-5) a solution of y \geq -2x +4y≥−2x+4 ?

FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Substitute the values and see.

-5 ≥ -2(-5) +4

-5 ≥ 14 . . . . . . . . FALSE

The point (-5, -5) is <em>not a solution</em> to the inequality

y ≥ -2x +4

___

A graph can quickly show you this.

7 0

3 years ago

The distance (d) in meters that an ant can travel varies directly with the amount of time (t) in hours it spends walking.assume

Assoli18 [71]

Answer: $d=18t$

Step-by-step explanation:

By definition, Direct proportion equations have the following form:

$y=kx$

Where "k" is the constant of proportionality.

In this case you know that the distance (in meters) that an ant can travel varies directly with the amount of time (in hours) the ant spends walking.

With this information you can write the following equation:

$d=kt$

According to the exercise, the constant of proportionality is:

$k=18$

Therefore, substituting the value of the constant of proportionality into the equation, you get that the equation that represents the proportional relationship between "d" and "t" is:

$d=18t$

4 0

3 years ago

Given J(1, 1), K(3, 1), L(3, -4), and M(1, -4) and that J'(-1, 5), K'(1, 5), L'(1, 0), and M'(-1, 0). What is the rule that tran

anastassius [24]

(x; y) -> (x - 2; y + 4)

J(1; 1) ⇒ J'(1 - 2; 1 + 4) = (-1; 5)

K(3; 1) ⇒ K'(3 - 2; 1 + 4) = (1; 5)

L(3;-4) ⇒ L'(3 - 2; -4 + 4) = (1; 0)

M(1;-4) ⇒ M'(1 - 2;-4 + 4) = (-1; 0)

5 0

3 years ago

0.5 km = M <br><br> Pls help me!!

Fudgin [204]

Answer:

500

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the spring, the owner of a sporting goods store decreases the price of winter gloves from $10.00 to $8.00. She increases the

TEA [102]

Answer:

without doing the math, we can affirm that the percent in decrease in the price of the gloves is <u>not</u> the same as the percent increase of the goggles. decreasing $2 from $10 will have a lower decrease than an increase of $2 from $8 since $2 represents a higher portion of $8 compared to $10

Step-by-step explanation:

(please give brainliest, much appreciated)

6 0

3 years ago

Anyone know the answer?​

Anyone know the answer?