1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marshall27 [118]
3 years ago
11

Perhatikan pernyataan berikut: 1.Menejemen 2.SDA / potensi daerah 3.Tata ruang yang bagus 4.Aparatur handal / SDM 5.Sejarah daer

ah. Faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan otonomi daerah ditunjukkan nomor
Law
1 answer:
Yuki888 [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1.  Otonomi dalam manajemen pada dasarnya berarti memberikan banyak kebebasan untuk membuat pilihan di tempat kerja. Seorang manajer yang memberikan otonomi karyawan biasanya menguraikan tujuan suatu proyek tetapi memungkinkan karyawan untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk mencapai tujuan itu.

2. Otonomi daerah memiliki keunggulan dalam memberikan kewenangan kebijaksanaan dan inovasi kepada daerah, memungkinkan perwakilan yang lebih besar dalam proses pengaturan daerah, dan membangun keadilan hukum yang lebih baik. Kelemahan ini memicu penyimpangan oleh kepala daerah sehingga mereka terseret ke dalam kasus hukum, dan memperbesar potensi konflik kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah

3.  

Ada dua aliran utama penelitian yang mengevaluasi hubungan antara manusia

praktik dan kinerja sumber daya. Yang pertama adalah universalisme atau "praktik terbaik"

pendekatan. Mereka yang menggunakan pendekatan ini menunjuk ke temuan dukungan berulang untuk menunjukkan

bahwa beberapa praktik SDM, seperti intensitas perekrutan, peluang karier internal,

penilaian kinerja, sistem pelatihan formal, pembagian keuntungan, dan kompensasi insentif

didokumentasikan dengan sangat baik dalam berbagai konteks untuk menunjukkan bahwa ada universalitasnya

You might be interested in
Compare the text of the United States' first amendment, guaranteeing Freedom of Expression, with the United Kingdom's Human Righ
jasenka [17]

Answer:

The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.

The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.

It states, for instance, that

<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to: </em>

  • <em> protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety </em>
  • <em>prevent disorder or crime </em>
  • <em>protect health or morals </em>
  • <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people </em>
  • <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence </em>
  • <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>

Cheers!

8 0
4 years ago
What’s is 2.4 if word form
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

lawyer serving as third-party neutral

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Which type of law involves incidents in which an individual commits an act against the public as a whole
klasskru [66]

Criminal law is the law that  involves incidents in which an individual commits an act against the public as a whole.

<h3>What is a criminal law?</h3>

This is the type of law that is concerned with the punishment that has to be issued to the offenders of the law.

Criminal laws are related to crimes that could be in the form of threats or harm to others.

Read more on criminal law here:

brainly.com/question/984900

#SPJ12

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following are civil service employees of the federal government? (Select all that apply.)
Rashid [163]
Supreme Court Chief Justice
member of the military
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review
Katarina [22]

Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.

In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.

The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The defendant will not be found liable for defamation, regardless of intent or knowledge of the falsity of the claim, if which p
    13·1 answer
  • 2) What is it called to restrain a person with intent to prevent his freedom by
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following would cause the value of a nation's GDP to increase in a given year?
    7·1 answer
  • What is shock incarceration
    12·1 answer
  • I NEED THE ANSWER TO THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!! When a president rejects a proposed law and sends it back to Congress for reconsiderat
    12·1 answer
  • Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which correct- ed us and we gave them "rever ence: shall we not much rather be in s
    13·1 answer
  • Create a list of the 10 most deviant acts you can imagine.
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Read Both Bills. Circle the parts that the two
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name for the series of declarations that details a political party's position on election issues?
    11·1 answer
  • Understanding a 'standard serving' allows you to compare
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!