1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitrij [34]
4 years ago
14

Why it is problematic if someone is issued with fraudulent license?

Law
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]4 years ago
8 0
Fraudulent license means that the license was obtained through illegal means. In this case, when someone has a fraudulent license, it is very problematic because he or she may be charged with different legal cases, or worse, may face revocation. Fraudulent license is considered as a criminal case so the punishment is also heavy. Cases like this involves identity theft. This would undergo thorough investigation which prevents the person from resuming his normal living.
You might be interested in
3 ways political parties help citizens
Arisa [49]

Answer:

1) The select candidates, set goals, and provide leadership.

2) The give citizens a voice in our government, they inform citizens

3) They involve citizens regularly

Explanation:

Hope this helps you as much as intended.

5 0
3 years ago
The Constitution creates the<br> _____Courts<br><br> , but Congress may establish ____ courts
MatroZZZ [7]

The Constitution creates the <u>Supreme</u> Courts, but the Congress may establish <u>District</u> courts.

5 0
4 years ago
_____ is full of helpful rules, guidelines, and resources to help answer any questions you might have about driving in Florida.
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

A. The Florida Driver License Handbook

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of opportunity cost?​
Damm [24]

Answer:

the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
omeli [17]

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What kind of sentence has the defendant serve time for each crime separately? _________________________________________
    10·1 answer
  • Under the Full faith and Credit Clause, what is the status of a property title?
    6·2 answers
  • In 1932 franklin d. Roosevelt and herbert hoover disagreed most strongly about the desirability of
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between cause in fact and proximate cause
    11·2 answers
  • Why were the men at war in 1651
    14·2 answers
  • Oh, so your a lawyer? name every law
    8·1 answer
  • What are the 4 best points to bring up that are for Emancipation of a Minor (age 16)?
    5·2 answers
  • 3. Means v. Clardy Case (Law Studies)<br><br> Could Means and Barry recover on any other theory?
    15·1 answer
  • Question Suspecting that a husband had slain his wife, police detectives persuaded one of the husband's colleagues at work to re
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!