Answer:
The dessert that a pulling his behavior can be best described through the incentive theory of motivation.
Explanation:
According to the incentive theory of motivation, our behaviors are influenced not by an intrinsic (internal) push, but by an extrinsic (external) pull. That is, we do what we do in order to obtain rewards - money, fame, beauty, etc. Simple examples of this external pull are situations such as Colin's, where the person does not really need to do something, but does it anyway simply because he is drawn to it. Colin is not hungry, but still chooses to eat the exotic desserts simply because they're there, available - and exotic. It is not different from someone who buys a new dress without needing it, just because they feel drawn to it. The dress itself is the incentive. However, let's highlight the fact that, on different occasions, the incentive may present a different value.
Answer:
Justice is important to Christians because the doctrine doesn’t support any form of retaliation or revenge for any wrongdoing. Instead Christians are told and encouraged by the Bible to always forgive one another of any deeds according to how God forgives us too.
Christianity talks about not putting law into one’s hands. This is why justice is valued by Christians when the perpetrators or guilty are punished by the relevant authorities.
Answer:
Globalization occurs when there is increased economic integration among countries. One of the advantages to free trade is that the benefits of trade flow are shared equally. When a foreign competitor is able to unfairly sell a product at a lower price. C. Imposing harsh penalties on country's that fail to protect labor
The argument recognised as “Meno's Paradox” can be reformulated as follows: If you be aware of what you are searching for, inquiry is unnecessary. If you don't understand what you are searching for, inquiry is impossible. Therefore, inquiry is both unnecessary or impossible.
<h3>What does Socrates say about Meno's paradox?</h3>
Meno's Paradox or Paradox of Inquiry states that “a man can't inquire either about what he knows or about what he does no longer understand – for he can't inquire about what he knows, because he is aware of it, and in that case is in no want of inquiry; nor again can he inquire about what he does not know.
Learn more about Meno's paradox here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/13364091</h3><h3>#SPJ13</h3>
