<span>The answer is: Galileo used mathematics to understand the universe, but scholars of the Middle Ages believed that knowledge came from God.
During that period, scientific knowledge still hasn't been recognized by the majority of the people. The religious teaching that being taught by the churches during that period was always regarded as a universal truth.
Galileo on the other hand, is one of the few people that was brave enough to challenge the church's authority. Due to his knowledge in Math and astronomy, he managed to disprove the church's narrative that always conveys that Earth is the center of the universe.</span>
The two basic research approaches are quantitative and qualitative research. Both types have different purposes. Quantitative research is statistics-based.
Answer:
Answer : Super due process
Explanation:
The "super due process" is an extension of "due process".
The 'due process' can be explained as the privilege or opportunity that is extended or given to the citizens to have a chance to comment or have a say on the decisions made by the governments.
Now, the 'super due process' is established by the judiciary especially the supreme court, where it is made known that only 'cruel and unusual punishment' should require capital punishment like sentencing to death.
In this case, there will be a reassurance that the worst of the worst criminals may be executed, that is sentenced to death.
<span>Jeong Hwa probably has a restraint approach to conflict. This means that Hwa hides or suppressing feelings and emotions. Hwa avoids nonverbal emotion during conflict and has a better way to control and internalize feelings. Hwa has a tight control over emotions.</span>
The existence of God is the traditional criticism of ontology. Many philosophers argued on this critic like Anselm of Canterbury, Rene Descartes, Gottfried Leibniz, Kurt Gödel, Alvin Plantinga, Mulla Sadra, and Allama Tabatabai. They have raised their ideas and arguments if God does really exist. Actually, Anselm’s contemporary was the first critic which using ontology. This was also the first mockery happened in the ontological argument.
