Answer:
Deal with all the negatives of the stress first and then move forward with a new plan for success.
Explanation:
Flexibility in a time of stress is perceived by the ability we have to adapt to circumstances, keep the emotional in check and move forward always looking for the best way to fix and reduce stressful situations. This flexibility is very committed to our resilience and ability to act under pressure. For this to happen, we must in a time of stress, deal with all the negative aspects of stress first and then move on with a new plan for success.
Answer:
Drunk farmers fought against the taxes placed by the government, exposing that America did not have a strong government to put the farmers back in their place.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is B.bargain in order to obtain the property rights of the gopher habitat.
Explanation:
In economics, the Coase Theorem states that in a market where transaction costs are negligible, a dispute between parties where property rights are involved will lead to a bargaining process where the party that gives the most value to whatever it's in dispute will end up winning rights over that property. In this case, the environmental group assigns great value to protecting the habitat of the Wyoming pocker gopher, but they can only fully secure its well-being by securing property rights over said habitat, and given their standing, they can expect to bargain or negotiate successfully. Any other option, like protesting, boycotting, or lobbying, won't be good enough to achieve their goals.
Answer:
The Stonewall riots (also referred to as the Stonewall uprising or the Stonewall rebellion) were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations by members of the gay (LGBT) community against a police raid that began in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn in the Greenwich Village neighborhood
Explanation:
lot has changed for LGBTQ Americans in the 50 years since June 28, 1969, when an uprising in response to a police raid at the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Manhattan’s West Village neighborhood, kicked off a new chapter of grassroots activism. The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down state bans on same-sex marriage; the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy has come and gone; one of the candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination is gay.
But one thing that has changed surprisingly little is the narrative about what exactly happened that night. In half a century, we haven’t gained any new major information about how Stonewall started, and even experts and eyewitnesses remain unsure how exactly things turned violent.
“We have, since 1969, been trading the same few tales about the riots from the same few accounts — trading them for so long that they have transmogrified into simplistic myth,”
