Assuming Reggie who is 55, had an adjusted gross income of $32,000 in 2020, Reggies medical expense deduction will be $75
Calculation to determine Reggie medical expense deduction
Drugs $500
Add Health insurance premium-after tax $850
Add Doctors fees $1,250
Add Eye glasses $375
Total expenses $2,975
($500+$850+$1,250+$375)
Less Insurance reimbursement ($500)
Less 7.5% of Adjusted gross income ($2,400)
($32,000×7.5%)
Medical Expense Deduction $75
($2,975 - $500 - $2,400)
Inconclusion assuming Reggie who is 55, had an adjusted gross income of $32,000 in 2020, Reggies medical expense deduction will be $75
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/17136095
Answer:
Check the answers below
Explanation:
- The per instrument cost of the bank is $0.25. Assuming uniform cheque value, the 24 million remittances across 10000 cheque will mean per cheque value of 2400. If this amount can be invested at 8% p.a., then daily investment income will be approx = 2400 * 8% /365 = $ 0.526
- Now for the company to jus about cover the cost of the cheque processing, the time should reduce by (assuming fractional time in days is possible) 0.25/0.526 = 0.48 days
- Now if the interest that can be earned reduces to 4%, the average daily interest will also reduce to $0.263. At this level, the time required to cover the cost should reduce by 0.95 days
The difference is simply because the opportunity cost in terms of alternate usage of funds has decreased for the company.
True Some no activist believe in a predetermined money growth rate
Answer:
B. $6,448,519
Explanation:
The computation of the present value of this growing annuity is given below:
PVA = [Cash flow at year 1 ÷ (interest rate - growth rate)] × {1 - [(1 + growth rate) ÷ (1 + interest rate)^number of years}
= [$675,000 ÷ (0.18 - 0.13)] × [1 - (1.13 ÷ 1.18)^15]
= $6,448,519
Hence, the correct option is b.
Answer:
C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.
Explanation:
During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.
Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.
