1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pav-90 [236]
3 years ago
11

30 points please help!

Business
1 answer:
WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

Social Security is Payroll Tax.

You might be interested in
Anika is disturbed to learn that she is only receiving a​ 2% merit pay increase when her cubicle mate is receiving​ 3%. She most
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

She believes that Distributive Justice is not achieved in giving out the raises.

Explanation:

Distributive Justice is the one which is described as perceived fairness of how the costs as well as the rewards are shared by the group members.

In this scenario, Anika believes that distributive justice is not achieved on her part as she is receiving a 2% merit pay increase whereas her cubicle mate receiving the 3%, which is not fair. That is why she believes like this.

7 0
3 years ago
Use the following scenario to answer the following questions: Natasha can produce either 5,000 pounds of cheese or 20 houses per
Savatey [412]

If Natasha can produce either 5,000 pounds of cheese or 20 houses per year and Jameson can produce either 5,000 pounds of cheese or 10 houses per year then,

  • Natasha has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
  • Jameson has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
<h3>What is comparative advantage?</h3>

The ability of an economy to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts is known as comparative advantage.

The example of comparative advantage is-

  • For instance, if a nation excels in producing both cheese and chocolate, they can choose to allocate the appropriate amount of labour to each product.
  • This nation has a comparative advantage in producing chocolate if it takes one hour of labour to make 10 units of cheese and one hour of labour to produce 20 units of chocolate.

The importance of comparative advantage are-

  • Ability to create a good or service for a lower opportunity cost is a benefit of comparative advantage.
  • Companies with a comparative advantage are able to sell their products and services for less than their rivals do, resulting in higher profit margins and stronger sales margins.

To know more about lower opportunity cost, here

brainly.com/question/481029

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
Judy Olsen, Kristy Johnston, and their mother, Joyce Johnston, owned seventy-eight acres of real property on Eagle Creek in Meag
nalin [4]

Answer:

Yes, Judy and Kristy do have an enforceable contract.

Explanation:

Kristy made a valid offer to Judy and Judy accepted.

In the offer letter, Kristy told Judy to "please respond to Bruce Townsend", but she did not specify that the only proper mode of acceptance was the response to Bruce. Since she did not specify that Judy could not respond directly to her, Judy's letter of acceptance to Kristy's offer is valid.

3 0
3 years ago
The management of Madeira Computing is considering the introduction of a wearable electronic device with the functionality of a
Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

Best-case profit: $2,500,000

Worst-case profit: -$300,000

Base case profit: $100,000

Explanation:

initial cost $300,000

variable cost between $160 - $240

most likely variable cost $200

sales price per unit $300

expected demand 0 - 20,000 units

most likely expected demand 4,000 units

best case scenario:

20,000 units x $300 = $6,000,000

- variable costs 20,000 x $160 = -$3,200,000

- fixed cost = -$300,000

profit = $2,500,000

base case scenario:

4,000 units x $300 = $1,200,000

- variable costs 4,000 x $200 = -$800,000

- fixed cost = -$300,000

profit = $100,000

worst case scenario:

0 units x $300 = $0

- fixed cost = -$300,000

profit = -$300,000

6 0
4 years ago
Roberta refuses to take her turn in her employer's mandatory overtime schedule, citing family commitments. Roberta's employer co
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

For Roberta citing family commitments as reason for participating in the mandatory extra hours cannot be justified in court. Although the court may be sympathetic, it is not enough public policy precedent.

The employer has the right to terminate her employment based on this refusal.

No public policy will be violated by the employer.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which vaccine does acip recommend for all college freshmen, aged 21 years or younger, living in dormitories, who have not been p
    15·1 answer
  • assuming that hamburgers and mustard are complements, a decrease in the price of hamburgers would increase the demand for mustar
    8·1 answer
  • True or False: A tax cut is less likely to change the composition of labor demand than a government spending increase.
    10·1 answer
  • This chart shows the link between
    11·2 answers
  • A company uses an activity-based costing system composed of three processes: tooling, processing, and resources. The company has
    9·1 answer
  • Types of direct participation programs include what?
    13·1 answer
  • Obtaining information by any means is okay.
    10·1 answer
  • Femur Co. acquired 70% of the voting common stock of Harbor Corp. on January 1, 2014. During 2014, Harbor had revenues of $2,500
    15·1 answer
  • Assuming that the price elasticity of demand for slinkys (slinkys are a metal spring-like children's toy) is 2, an increase in t
    13·1 answer
  • Using the straight-line method, depreciation for 2024 and book value on december 31, 2024, would be:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!