People in the "pro" side would say what's good about whatever the topic is.
Consumer behavior is influenced by advertising/news, with both of these influences persuading consumers to buy a product or making the product appear to be more than it actually is, even leaving the consumer to feel they missed out if they don't go out and buy this new awesome product.
Two examples: a Wendy's( or any fast food advertisement) ad advertises the new 4 for 4, the consumer can get a burger, fries, chicken nuggets, and drink for only $4. Who wouldn't purchase this cheap, mouth watering deal?
Another example would be: A makeup advertisement or even hair products appeal to women consumers, the advertisement encourages the women to go buy this new product because their has never been anyother like it. This new beauty product can work miracles!!
Disagreements regarding the legality of owning slaves were one of the fundamental causes of the Civil War. The Southern states' refusal to secede and acceptance of abolition was the only agreement that could have prevented war by that point.
What is slavery?
The practice of owning slaves is referred to as “slavery.” A person who is under the ownership and control of another instructions.
Six proposed constitutional amendments and four proposed Congressional resolutions made up the “Crittenden Compromise,” which came to be known as Crittenden's plan to pacify Southern states and prevent civil war.
Hence, the significance of the Civil War is aforementioned.
Learn more about on Civil War, here:
brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
Answer:
Poverty and wealth are often found side by side. They are two dimensions in our world that are interrelated because they affect each other and influence both the willingness and capacity of states to ensure a stable global system. Traditional approaches to IR are premised on the notion of state sovereignty. But, sovereignty as an absolute concept that reinforces separation between states has been tempered through the many processes of globalisation, including economic agreements and the establishment of international organisations, as well as with the emergence of human rights thinking as captured through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With respect to the emergence of human rights thinking, the premise goes that in the context of a common set of universal rights based on the individual, the sovereignty of the state can be challenged if a government does not respect or maintain these rights. Here, sovereignty means that a state does not only maintain rights, it also meets its responsibilities. Poor people are cheated out of their savings and the rich flaunt their money like it's honest and hard worked generated money.
Answer:
People would be happier and there would be less death by killing yourself ( you know what I mean) Video Games would not be as toxic. There is proof of this there was one time the whole inter was taken down for a day and people said they were happy. If it was state-regulated people would not say things that they would not say in person because there weak and hid being a phone, etc. Also all people on tw itter the twertards need to burn.
Explanation:
