Gibson's argument in the case was that the judiciary has the power to declare a law unconstitutional. This still rings true.
Explanation:
The landmark case of Eakin v Raub was one that sparked debate and controversy on constitutional bounds and rights of the judiciary.
Justice Marshall had offered many arguments that despite the constitution not giving the judiciary explicit power to make laws unconstitutional, it is to bee one of the powers of judiciary.
In Justice Gibson's argument, it must be taken for granted that the judiciary has power over the legislature for the laws to be declared unconstitutional which fits in with the debate on powers of the houses.
Answer A because she did advise Oglethorpe on Indian affairs.
Answer:
athropoda
Explanation:
it is the smallest animal
it has short leg
out is
Answer:
Untouchability is the practice of discriminating against a person by caste, creed or religion.
it is also the practice of discriminating against a person by caste, religion or Creed.
Every person born into this world is a beautiful creature of God, and no one deserves to be discriminated.
Everyone is beautiful in its way an thus everyone should be respected for who they are. Untouchability and racism are the worst things that ever happen to humanity.
Explanation: